Low mood
A facet of neuroticism, published as Depression. Four items in the IPIP-NEO-120.
The third facet of neuroticism is how readily low mood and discouragement arise: whether a person often feels blue, is hard on themselves and struggles to feel comfortable in their own skin. It is a trait facet scored across a whole population, where most people sit in the middle.
What it does not mean
A high score is not a diagnosis, and the scale does not test for any condition. It records how often a person says they feel low and how they feel about themselves, compared with a large sample of other people. It is a tendency, not a state, and a score is a comparison, not a verdict.
A low score is not cheerfulness, which is a facet of extraversion. Low scorers are comfortable with themselves and rarely feel blue; how much joy they feel is a separate question.
Four items make a short scale. A facet score moves more between attempts than the 24-item domain score, and it describes a tendency in ordinary life as the person reports it, not a diagnosis of anything.
High and low in daily life
High. People high on this facet say they often feel blue, are often down in the dumps and are not comfortable with themselves. In daily life that shows as a harsh inner critic, a tendency to read setbacks as evidence about oneself, and moods that take time to lift. Many high scorers are also the most reflective and self-aware people in a room.
Low. People low on this facet say they feel comfortable with themselves and rarely feel blue. In daily life that shows as taking criticism as information rather than as a verdict, bouncing back from a bad week, and a settled sense of being all right as they are.
Parent domain
- Neuroticism: the broad trait this facet belongs to, with five sibling facets.
What the research says it predicts
Of all thirty facets, this one is the strongest single correlate of lower life satisfaction and happiness, and cheerfulness, its counterpart in extraversion, the strongest correlate of higher. (Anglim and others, 2020)
Self-esteem and this side of neuroticism are so closely related that one large study treats them, with self-efficacy and locus of control, as indicators of a single core self-evaluation. (Judge, Erez, Bono and Thoresen, 2002)
Neuroticism falls on average through adulthood, with most of the change before middle age. (Roberts, Walton and Viechtbauer, 2006)
Where people fall
The spread of scores
Curve height shows how common each score is; the darker middle holds half of all people. If you have taken a test on this device, your marker is drawn on.
IPIP-NEO-120, low mood, 4 items
410,376 people
The other facets of neuroticism
Sources and licence
Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279-323. doi:10.1037/bul0000226
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693-710. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1-25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
Instrument: IPIP-NEO-120. Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78-89. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003 Key: https://ipip.ori.org/30FacetNEO-PI-RItems.htm.
Norms: Johnson, J. A. IPIP-NEO-120 public dataset (IPIP120.dat), OSF component wxvth of osf.io/tbmh5, https://osf.io/wxvth/.
Licence: Public domain (IPIP). Permission is granted automatically for any person to use IPIP items for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. https://ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm
Instrument: IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 Key: https://ipip.ori.org/newBigFive5broadKey.htm.
Norms: Open-Source Psychometrics Project, IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers responses (IPIP-FFM-data-8Nov2018.zip), 1,015,342 responses collected 2016 to 2018, https://openpsychometrics.org/_rawdata/.
Licence: Public domain (IPIP). Permission is granted automatically for any person to use IPIP items for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. https://ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm