Vulnerability
A facet of neuroticism. Four items in the IPIP-NEO-120.
The sixth facet of neuroticism is feeling overwhelmed under pressure: whether a person tends to panic when things go wrong, to feel that events are too much for them, and to struggle to think clearly in a crisis. Its opposite is the composure of people who get calmer as things get worse.
What it does not mean
A high score is not weakness, and it is not a diagnosis. It describes how a person says they feel when pressure is high, compared with other people. Many high scorers are highly capable in ordinary conditions and know to avoid roles built around emergencies; that is self-knowledge, not failure.
A low score is not competence. Staying calm and knowing what to do are different things, and the scale measures only the first.
Four items make a short scale. A facet score moves more between attempts than the 24-item domain score, and it describes a tendency in ordinary life as the person reports it, not a diagnosis of anything.
High and low in daily life
High. People high on this facet say they panic easily, become overwhelmed by events and feel unable to deal with things. In daily life that shows as freezing when several things go wrong at once, needing someone else to take charge in a crisis, and dread of being the one responsible when it matters.
Low. People low on this facet say they remain calm under pressure and feel able to deal with whatever comes. In daily life that shows as being the steady one when a plan falls apart, thinking clearly in an emergency, and a reputation for being unflappable, which can hide how much is going on underneath.
Parent domain
- Neuroticism: the broad trait this facet belongs to, with five sibling facets.
What the research says it predicts
The sense of being able to deal with things, which this facet measures from the negative side, is close to what the self-efficacy facet of conscientiousness measures from the positive side; one large study treats neuroticism, self-esteem and self-efficacy as indicators of a single core self-evaluation. (Judge, Erez, Bono and Thoresen, 2002)
It belongs to the withdrawal aspect of neuroticism and relates to lower life satisfaction and happiness, with a moderate effect. (Anglim and others, 2020)
Emotional stability rises on average through adulthood, so a high score tends to fall with age. (Roberts, Walton and Viechtbauer, 2006)
Where people fall
The spread of scores
Curve height shows how common each score is; the darker middle holds half of all people. If you have taken a test on this device, your marker is drawn on.
IPIP-NEO-120, vulnerability, 4 items
410,376 people
The other facets of neuroticism
Sources and licence
Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E., & Thoresen, C. J. (2002). Are measures of self-esteem, neuroticism, locus of control, and generalized self-efficacy indicators of a common core construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 693-710. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.693
Anglim, J., Horwood, S., Smillie, L. D., Marrero, R. J., & Wood, J. K. (2020). Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 279-323. doi:10.1037/bul0000226
Roberts, B. W., Walton, K. E., & Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1-25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
Instrument: IPIP-NEO-120. Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78-89. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003 Key: https://ipip.ori.org/30FacetNEO-PI-RItems.htm.
Norms: Johnson, J. A. IPIP-NEO-120 public dataset (IPIP120.dat), OSF component wxvth of osf.io/tbmh5, https://osf.io/wxvth/.
Licence: Public domain (IPIP). Permission is granted automatically for any person to use IPIP items for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. https://ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm
Instrument: IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 Key: https://ipip.ori.org/newBigFive5broadKey.htm.
Norms: Open-Source Psychometrics Project, IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers responses (IPIP-FFM-data-8Nov2018.zip), 1,015,342 responses collected 2016 to 2018, https://openpsychometrics.org/_rawdata/.
Licence: Public domain (IPIP). Permission is granted automatically for any person to use IPIP items for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. https://ipip.ori.org/newPermission.htm